Seth Rich: confirman la existencia de contactos con Wikileaks como posible causa de su asesinato

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIpd-3YtHX4

El detective contratado por la familia dice haber encontrado pruebas de contactos con Wikileaks en el ordenador portátil de Seth Rich.
También afirma que la policía ha recibido órdenes de no investigar el caso.

Hay que recordar que Seth Rich, quien trabajaba para el partido Demócrata, fue asesinado el año pasado cerca de su casa en Washington, supuestamente en un robo, aunque ni su reloj, ni su cartera, ni sus tarjetas le fueron sustraídos.

5 Me gusta

De hecho ya se dice que ante el revuelo formado en internet han sacado la noticia de Trump de hoy para taparla

:fu:

A Seth Rich le dispararon por la espalda en un callejón a las 3 am, supuestamente saliendo de un bar. Lo raro es que supuestamente en teoría fue un robo pero como bien dices no le quitaron nada. El modus operandi es sorprendentemente similar al de los casi 30 casos de gente que ha muerto asesinada o suicidada del entorno de los Clinton.

2 Me gusta

También es extraño que el portavoz de la familia sea un tipo que también ha trabajado para el partido Demócrata:

Y que la familia haya publicado un comunicado en el que poco menos le echa tierra encima a lo dicho por el detective que se supone que está ayudando a la familia, aunque por lo visto le paga una tercera persona.

[quote]
“We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law enforcement and the general public from finding Seth’s murderers. The services of the private investigator who spoke to press was offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorized by the family.”[/quote]

Uno lee este titular:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.01e3b3e388bf

Y le invita a pensar que Trump le ha pasado los códigos nucleares a los rusos para que puedan bombardear USA a placer… Y la realidad es que había compartido información para prevenir atentados del ISIS en transportes aéreos… Menuda tomadura de pelo, joder!!


2 Me gusta

Por eso te digo, parece ser que ayer el asesinato fue TT y estaba on fire y se han sacado esto de la manga para taparlo

1 me gusta

https://youtu.be/wQRDkppCqNM

La historia ha cambiado un poco desde que el investigador dijo que había visto el intercambio de correos entre Seth Rich y WikiLeaks… ahora dice que no lo ha visto personalmente, que se había enterado por la propia Fox News, que a su vez había recibido la información de una fuente anónima…

1 me gusta
1 me gusta

http://vesselnews.io/seth-richs-reddit-account-discovered-loved-pandas-patriotic-clothes-joe-rogan/

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/someone-just-edited-seth-richs-reddit-posts-b5f185b0aab

1 me gusta

http://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/3559/A-Partial-Seth-Rich-Chronology-Part-1.aspx

En este artículo explican muy bien la cronología de lo sucedido entorno a Seth Rich, el partido Demócrata y la supuesta intervención de agentes rusos en la brecha de seguridad de los servidores del Democratic National Comitee.

No hay que perder de vista el hecho de que el FBI todavía no ha accedido a los servidores del DNC para inspeccionarlos:

[quote]
March 20, 2017: Then-FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Rogers appear before the House Intelligence Committee.

HURD: Have you been able to – when did the DNC provide access for – to the FBI for your technical folks to review what happened?

COMEY: Well we never got direct access to the machines themselves. The DNC in the spring of 2016 hired a firm that ultimately shared with us their forensics from their review of the system.

HURD: Director Rogers, did the NSA ever get access to the DNC hardware?

ROGERS: The NSA didn’t ask for access. That’s not in our job…

HURD: … So director FBI notified the DNC early, before any information was put on Wikileaks and when – you have still been – never been given access to any of the technical or the physical machines that were – that were hacked by the Russians.

COMEY: That’s correct although we got the forensics from the pros that they hired which – again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this – my folks tell me was an appropriate substitute.[/quote]

En la noticia que lanza el Washington Post el 14 de junio de 2016, una ejecutiva del DNC afirma que, tras ser alertada por un jefe de operaciones acerca de actividad inusual en su red, se puso en contacto con la empresa de abogados que representa al DNC y con el presidente de la empresa de seguridad informática que tenían contratada, llamada CrowdStrike, y que en ningún momento llamó al FBI:

[quote]
In the June 14, 2016 story, DNC chief executive Amy Dacey explained to the Post what happened after she received a call from “her operations chief” about “unusual network activity” noticed by the IT team in “late April.”

That evening, she spoke with Michael Sussman, a DNC lawyer who is a partner with Perkins Coie in Washington. Soon after, Sussmann, a former federal prosecutor who handled computer crime cases, called [CrowdStrike president Shawn Henry], whom he has known for many years.

I highlight “that evening” “DNC lawyer” “Perkins Coie” “Crowdstrike” and “many years” to highlight the political nature of this chain of damage control. Dacey spoke with Sussman, the DNC lawyer, that evening – instead of say, the FBI cyber crime unit that day. As a Perkins Coie partner, Sussmann is with the leading Democrat law firm: Perkins Coie has produced an Obama White House Counsel; a lawyer to ferry that copy of Obama’s “birth certificate” from Hawaii to the White House; and it has represented the DNC, Democrats in Congress, Obama’s presidential campaign, and, at that moment in June 2016, the Clinton presidential campaign.

With all of those Democrat interests in mind, the DNC and Perkins Coie choose to turn to CrowdStrike. Who, what is Crowdstrike? Here is one hair-raising theory. It is a fact that Moscow-born co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch is a nonresident senior fellow of the Atlantic Council, a globalist, interventionist and swampist think tank, which gave Hillary Clinton its Distinguished International Leadership Award in 2013.

The political nature of the DNC’s choice of a politically connected cyber-security firm itself is not too surprising; what is five-alarm-shocking, though, is that the FBI has never verified the firm’s “Russian hacking” findings. [/quote]

Esa empresa de seguridad informática, Crowdstrike, fue la que presentó un informe alegando que los hackers eran unos rusos porque se habían encontrado las mismas trazas que en un ataque que había sufrido el ejército ucraniano.

Curiosamente esa misma empresa de seguridad había sido contratada por el DNC para investigar el acceso por parte de miembros de la camapaña de Bernie Sanders a las bases de datos de votantes del partido Demócrata. Y también curiosamente el cargo de Seth Rich en el DNC era el de voter expansion data director:

[quote]
But according to internal emails, CrowdStrike was already working for the DNC to investigate whether Bernie Sanders campaign staffers had gained unauthorized access to its voter database.

That five-week investigation appeared to have wrapped up on April 29, 2016. …

“Already working for the DNC” in this timeframe of still-undisclosed anti-Bernie collusion means, in effect, already working in support of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign against Sanders. Great source for non-partisan and official intelligence.

And check this out: voter data base, Bernie Sanders staffers. Seth Rich’s job at the DNC has been reported as “voter expansion data director.” Related? Should the Seth Rich chronology go back to alleged dirty tricks in December 2015 involving yet another data breach?[/quote]

2 Me gusta

[quote]I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK.
I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

“He wanted to change that from the inside.”
I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.[/quote]

1 me gusta

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/23/statement-on-coverage-seth-rich-murder-investigation.html

Ahora la Fox se retracta de la información que dio relativa a la implicación de Seth Rich con las filtraciones a WikiLeaks.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/the-life-and-death-of-the-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory/2017/05/23/aba640c4-3ff3-11e7-adba-394ee67a7582_story.html?utm_term=.ed69bdc0d4db

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/05/22/sean-hannity-just-gave-the-game-away/

[quote]When Seth Rich’s Gmail account received an alert this week from Mega.com, attempting to start a new account on a website created by the New Zealand-based Internet businessman and convicted hacker Kim Dotcom, his family knew that something was off.

According to experts and Rich’s family, the emailed invitation from [email protected] appeared to be an attempt to gain access to Rich’s email. Joel Rich, who maintains his late son’s Gmail account, did not click the link. Meanwhile, Dotcom was promising on Twitter to prove that the younger Rich had been in contact with WikiLeaks — and Fox News host Sean Hannity was telling his 2.37 million Twitter followers to be ready for a revelation.

The latest revelation — that a hacker from New Zealand may have been trying as recently as this week to hack into Rich’s email — offered fresh evidence that the conspiracy theory is false. Dotcom, it seemed, may have been willing to create a fake archive of emails from Rich to “prove” his role in the DNC hack.[/quote]

Al periodista de la FOX que estaba publicando información relativa a este caso le están intentando dejar sin anunciantes para su programa y, consecuentemente, echarlo a la p*** calle. Y todo ello dirgido por MediaMatters, una organización ligada a Soros y al DNC.

http://hiddenamericans.com/politics/liberal-fascism-media-matters-targets-sean-hannity-advertisers/

En cuanto a KimDotCom, siguen acusándolo de intentar hackear la cuenta de Gmail de Seth Rich para crear pruebas falsas:

1 me gusta

Dotcom siempre está enredando desde su barco en aguas neozelandesas

Es muy activo en twitter y está “hasta arriba” de juicios contra Estados Unidos

Acabarán con él tarde o temprano…harán que parezca un accidente

2 Me gusta

Siempre me he preguntado de qué vive esta gente, con qué se paga sus facturas,… serán cabeza de condon?

Kim Dotcom, de tener una fortuna de US$ 1000 millones a declararse en quiebra
El empresario asegura que está en bancarrota y que no puede pagarle a sus abogados.
(Fuente: infotechnology.com)

1 me gusta

[quote]
9. The Washington Post article states (in part):

When Seth Rich’s Gmail account received an alert this week from Mega.com, attempting to start a new account on a website created by the New Zealand-based Internet businessman and convicted hacker Kim Dotcom, his family knew that something was off.Over seven frenzied days, Dotcom had become a leading purveyor of the theory that Rich, a staffer at the Democratic National Committee who was shot dead near his home in Northeast Washington last summer, had supplied DNC documents to WikiLeaks and was killed as a result. Multiple security analysts and an FBI investigation have tied the release to hackers with ties to Russia. D.C. police have said repeatedly that they think Rich was slain in a random robbery attempt.

According to experts and Rich’s family, the emailed invitation from [email protected] appeared to be an attempt to gain access to Rich’s email. Joel Rich, who maintains his late son’s Gmail account, did not click the link. Meanwhile, Dotcom was promising on Twitter to prove that the younger Rich had
been in contact with WikiLeaks — and Fox News host Sean Hannity was telling his 2.37 million Twitter followers to be ready for a revelation.

The latest revelation — that a hacker from New Zealand may have been trying as recently as this week to hack into Rich’s email — offered fresh evidence that the conspiracy theory is false. Dotcom, it seemed, may have been willing to create a fake archive of emails from Rich to “prove” his role in the DNC hack.

  • The clear inference the reader is invited to draw from the above is that I attempted to hack Mr Rich’s email account. This is simply not true and is made without any genuine foundation. As you know, the email correspondence between us can be checked and contains no such threat.

  • It is alleged that Mr Rich’s email account received a verification email from mega.nz. That may be so. But that does not mean that any attempt was made to hack his email account. Literally anyone could have gone to Mega.nz and registered an account there using Mr Rich’s gmail address, which was publicly known. That would then have resulted in Mega sending a verification email to that address. If someone had registered Mr Rich’s email at Dropbox for example, Dropbox would likewise have sent a confirmation link. That has nothing to do with hacking.

  • If there has been an attempt to hack Mr Rich’s email account, I know nothing of it andthere is no connection to me. There is no credible basis in fact to link me to any attempted hacking of Mr Rich’s email. If the family genuinely believe they can establish a link, which I do not accept, then by all means disclose that and I will respond to it and rebut it openly. I would welcome this. Once the allegation is shown to be without foundation, the focuscould once again return to the DNC leaks and Mr Rich’s death.

  • The suggestion that I am attempting to plant evidence into Mr Rich’s email account would appear to be an attempt to discredit any evidence I may give before I have a chance to give it. That those who seek to speak the truth are, as I have been, subjected to a smear campaign to try to discredit them indicates to me that the truth is known and not welcome.[/quote]